Lesson 4 of 5

Lesson 1.1.4

Credits without surprises: read the badge before you run

8 min readBeginner

What this costs

Free to read. The point of the lesson is that nothing surprises you afterwards.

Before you start

Nothing.

This is the most important lesson in the Akademy and the one the old version never had. Kuration charges in four different ways, every tool tells you which one it uses, and almost every "why did that cost so much" support ticket is someone who never looked.

Read the badge on the tool card

Everything in this lesson comes down to one habit. Open the Toolbox, find the tool you are about to use, and read the badge on its card. Every tool states its own price and its own charging behaviour there, and that badge is always current in a way no lesson or price list can be.

The Kuration Toolbox with four different cost badges visible: Per result, If result, FREE, and a flat credit figure
1
2
3
4
  1. 1Per result: charged per profile returned
  2. 2If result: a miss is free
  3. 3FREE: never charged
  4. 4No behaviour badge: every row charged
All four badges, on one screen. The number is only half the answer. The badge beside it decides what a miss costs you.

The four badges, and what each one means for a miss

FREEFound a valuefreeFound nothingfree2Cno second badgeFound a valueyou payFound nothingyou pay2C · If resultFound a valueyou payFound nothingfree2C · Per resultThree came backthree chargesNothing came backfreeTHIS IS THE ONE THAT SURPRISES PEOPLEThe badge is on every tool card in the Toolbox. Read it before you run.
Badge on the cardYou are chargedA miss costs youRun it
FREENeverNothingAs often as you like. Scoring lives here
A credit figure on its ownFor every row the tool processesThe same as a hitAfter filtering, never before
A figure plus If resultOnly on rows where it returned a valueNothingWide, on a filtered list
A figure plus Per resultOnce per item returned, so one row can charge several timesNothingWide, but cap what it returns per row

The tools whose behaviour you should know by heart

ToolWhat to expect on the cardWhy it matters
Scoring AgentFREEIt reasons over data already in the row rather than researching. Score early, score often, and use the score to gate the paid columns
Official Website FinderA flat per row figureThe dependency almost every other tool has. Run it on the rows that are missing a website, not on all of them
Find PeopleA figure plus Per resultOne company can return several people. Budget on results
Waterfall LogicFREEPicks the first non empty value from several inputs, so you can chain cheap attempts before an expensive one
Verification and QA toolsA flat per row figureA fail costs the same as a pass, because deciding it was a fail is the work
Custom Research ToolA per row figurePreview on five rows before you create the column across the table

Predicting a run before you press it

Work it out per column, not per project. For each column you are about to create: how many rows will it actually run on after filters, what does the card say one unit costs, and does a miss cost anything.

Here is the same 1,000 sourced companies built two ways. The unit prices below are made up for the arithmetic. Substitute whatever your own tool cards say, because the shape of the result is the point rather than the totals.

Worked example · The same 1,000 companies, flat versus curated first

StepWithout curatingCurating first
Rows after sourcing1,0001,000
Filter on what the source gave you, freeskipped380 remain
Website Finder, say 2 credits a row2,000760
Score against your ICP, free00
Cut to rows scoring 7 or above, freeskipped145 remain
One decision maker each, say 3 credits a resultabout 3,000about 435
Totalabout 5,000about 1,195

Same source, same tools, same outcome for the rows you were ever going to email. The difference is entirely the order, and two filters that cost nothing.

Where to check what you actually spent

The Kuration project analytics panel showing total credits consumed and average enrichment for a project
1
2
  1. 1Total credits consumed, for the life of this project.
  2. 2Average enrichment across the table. High spend with low enrichment means you paid to research rows that were never going to answer.
Every project reports its own lifetime credit usage, alongside how complete the enrichment actually is. Those two numbers together are the only honest measure of whether a list was worth it.

Your remaining credits sit in the top navigation of the dashboard. For a breakdown by action, open Settings and then Usage. If a run surprised you, that breakdown tells you which column did it, which is usually enough to spot the missing condition.

Ran an expensive tool before filtering

What you see
The balance drops by thousands on a list you then cut to a tenth
The fix
Filter, then select the visible rows, then run. When filters are active only visible rows are processed.

Deleted a column expecting a refund

What you see
Column gone, credits still spent
The fix
Deleting a column does not refund credits, the work was already done. Preview on a handful of rows before creating a column on all of them.

Read the unit price but not the behaviour badge

What you see
A per result tool costs far more than rows times unit price
The fix
One row can return several results. Read both badges on the card, not just the number.

Re ran a whole column to fix a few empty cells

What you see
Paying twice for rows that already worked
The fix
Successfully enriched rows are not re processed on a normal re run. Course 2.3 covers the advanced run options that control this.

Check yourself

0 of 3 answered

1.A tool card shows a credit figure and the words "If result". What does a miss cost you?

2.A tool card shows a credit figure with no behaviour badge beside it. What does that mean?

3.You delete a column you regret creating. What happens to the credits?

Answer all 3, then open Reading a cell: where the value came from, and how sure we are to tick this lesson off.

Try it yourself

Take a project with at least 50 rows. Before running anything, write down what it would cost to add websites to every row, and what it would cost to add websites only to rows missing one. Then check the difference in the Usage breakdown after you run the second version.

You have done it when
Your predicted cost for the filtered run is within 10 percent of what was actually deducted.
Credit budget
Small, if you filter first. That is the whole exercise.